Use of EdDSA Signatures in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-08

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Kathleen Moriarty Yes

Comment (2017-10-11 for -07)
Thank you for your work on this draft and for addressing the SecDir review comments.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/FIm8MqdrQSOwXAsRkfJ27VFUF2k

Eric Rescorla Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Ben Campbell No Objection

Benoit Claise No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Spencer Dawkins No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

Comment (2017-10-10 for -07)
I am in no way a subject matter expert in this field, but the bits I did understand were all easily understandable :-)

Mirja K├╝hlewind No Objection

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Adam Roach No Objection

Comment (2017-10-10 for -07)
Section 1.2:

   CMS values are generated using ASN.1 [X680], which uses the Basic
   Encoding Rules (BER) and the Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)
   [X690].

Recommend:

   CMS values are generated using ASN.1 [X680], using the Basic
   Encoding Rules (BER) and the Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)
   [X690].

(Rationale: ASN.1 has many more encodings than this, and the original phrasing implies that these are the only two.)

I'm a little surprised that there are no citations for Curve25519, Curve488, and "Schnorr's signature system." If it is realistic add citations for these, I believe it would be an improvement.