Skip to main content

Adding acronyms to simplify DANE conversations
draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-00

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 7218.
Author Ólafur Guðmundsson
Last updated 2013-09-19
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state In WG Last Call
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state Became RFC 7218 (Proposed Standard)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-00
DANE                                                      O. Gudmundsson
Internet-Draft                                             Shinkuro Inc.
Updates: 6698 (if approved)                           September 19, 2013
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: March 23, 2014

             Adding acronyms to simplify DANE conversations
                  draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-00

Abstract

   Experience has show that people get confused using the three numeric
   fields the TLSA record.  This document specifies descriptive acronyms
   for the three numeric fields in the TLSA records.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 23, 2014.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Gudmundsson              Expires March 23, 2014                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft     Adding acronyms to DANE registries     September 2013

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  IANA considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  TLSA Certificate Usages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  TLSA Selectors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  TLSA Matching types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Examples of usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Appendix A.  Document history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   During discussions on how to add DANE [RFC6698] technology to new
   protocols/services people repeatedly have got confused as what the
   numeric values stand for and even the order of the fields of a TLSA
   record.  This document updates the IANA registry definition for TLSA
   record to add a column with acronym for each specified field, in
   order to reduce confusion.  This document does not change the DANE
   protocol in any way.

   It is expected that DANE parser's in applications and DNS software
   MAY adopt parsing the acronyms for each field, installed base MAY NOT
   get updated.

1.1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

2.  IANA considerations

   This document applies to "DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities
   (DANE) Parameters" located at "http://www.iana.org/assignments/dane-
   parameters/dane-parameters.xhtml".  Each one of the Sub-registries
   will add a column with an acronym for that field.

   [RFC6698] and this document are both to be the reference documents
   for the three sub-registries.

   As these acronyms are offered for human consumption, case does not
   matter, it is expected that software the parses TLSA records will
   handle any case use in the input> The expectation is that by using

Gudmundsson              Expires March 23, 2014                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft     Adding acronyms to DANE registries     September 2013

   the acronyms in production systems fewer bad TLSA records will be
   published.

2.1.  TLSA Certificate Usages

    +-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
    | Value | Acronym  | Short Description              | Reference   |
    +-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+
    |   0   | PKIX-CA  | CA      constraint             | [RFC6698]   |
    |   1   | PKIX-EE  | Service certificate constraint | [RFC6698]   |
    |   2   | DANE-TA  | Trust anchor assertion         | [RFC6698]   |
    |   3   | DANE-EE  | Domain-issued certificate      | [RFC6698]   |
    | 4-254 |          | Unassigned                     |             |
    |  255  | PrivCert | Reserved for Private Use       | [RFC6698]   |
    +-------+----------+--------------------------------+-------------+

                     Table 1: TLSA Certificate Usages

   Note: should the short description be updated to be more expressive ?

   Other options suggested for 0: PKIX-TA

2.2.  TLSA Selectors

       +-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
       | Value | Acronym | Short Description        | Reference   |
       +-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+
       |   0   | Cert    | Full certificate         | [RFC6698]   |
       |   1   | SPKI    | SubjectPublicKeyInfo     | [RFC6698]   |
       | 2-254 |         | Unassigned               |             |
       |  255  | PrivSel | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698]   |
       +-------+---------+--------------------------+-------------+

                          Table 2: TLSA Selectors

2.3.  TLSA Matching types

      +-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
      | Value | Acronym   | Short Description        | Reference   |
      +-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+
      |   0   | Full      | No hash used             | [RFC6698]   |
      |   1   | SHA2-256  | 256 bit hash by SHA2     | [RFC6698]   |
      |   2   | SHA2-512  | 512 bit hash by SHA2     | [RFC6698]   |
      | 3-254 |           | Unassigned               |             |
      |  255  | PrivMatch | Reserved for Private Use | [RFC6698]   |
      +-------+-----------+--------------------------+-------------+

                       Table 3: TLSA Matching types

Gudmundsson              Expires March 23, 2014                 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft     Adding acronyms to DANE registries     September 2013

3.  Examples of usage

   TLSA records using/displaying the acronyms:
   _666._tcp.first.example.  TLSA PKIX-CA CERT SHA2-512 {blob}
   _666._tcp.second.example.  TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob}

   Acronym use in a specification example: "Protocol FOO only allows
   TLSA records using PKIX-EE and DANE-EE, with selector SPKI and using
   SHA2-512."

4.  Security considerations

   This document only changes registry fields and does not change the
   behavior of any protocol.  The hope is to reduce confusion and lead
   to better specification and operations.

5.  Acknowledgements

   Scott Schmit offered real good suggestions to decrease the
   possibility of confusion.  Viktor Dukhovni provided comments from
   expert point of view.

6.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC6698]  Hoffman, P. and J. Schlyter, "The DNS-Based Authentication
              of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS)
              Protocol: TLSA", RFC 6698, August 2012.

Appendix A.  Document history

   [RFC Editor: Please remove this section before publication ]

   00 Initial version

   01 Updated version based on some comments ready for WGLC

   00 WG version almost identical to 01

Author's Address

Gudmundsson              Expires March 23, 2014                 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft     Adding acronyms to DANE registries     September 2013

   Olafur Gudmundsson
   Shinkuro Inc.
   4922 Fairmont Av, Suite 250
   Bethesda, MD  20814
   USA

   Email: ogud@ogud.com

Gudmundsson              Expires March 23, 2014                 [Page 5]