%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6-09 instead of this revision. @techreport{ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6-07, number = {draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6-07}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6/07/}, author = {Yong Cui and Peng Wu and Jianping Wu and Ted Lemon}, title = {{DHCPv4 over IPv6 Transport}}, pagetotal = 13, year = 2013, month = sep, day = 21, abstract = {In IPv6 networks, there remains a need to provide IPv4 service for some residual devices. This document describes a mechanism for allocating IPv4 addresses to such devices, using DHCPv4 with an IPv6 transport. It is done by putting a special relay agent function (Client Relay Agent) on the client side, as well as extending the behavior of the server; in the case where DHCP server only supports IPv4 transport, a relay agent is extended to support IPv6 transport (IPv6-Transport Relay Agent) and relay DHCP traffic for the server, with a new Relay Agent Information sub-option added to carry the IPv6 address of the Client Relay Agent.}, }