Client Link-Layer Address Option in DHCPv6
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-05
Yes
(Ralph Droms)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-03-11)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my discuss.
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-02-26 for -04)
Unknown
s2: r/For e.g./For example, ;) s7: I agree with Stephen's point about the need for a new privacy consideration.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-02-25 for -04)
Unknown
- Section 2 says that "...it can be used along with other identifiers to associate DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 messages from a dual stack client." Why would this be needed? (Saying "lawful intercept" is not a good answer here.) I think it'd be useful to provide a non-LI reason for why this is useful. - Section 7 could usefully note that if IPsec is not used then anyone who can see packets sent between the relay agent and server with this option, or anyone who can see a log that contains this options's value, can probably track the client in a new way. That'd be a privacy issue so yet again motivates use of IPsec but also motivates not logging this option value, or at least considering security and privacy when doing that.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown