Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-sntp-01
Yes
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(Russ Housley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-01-20)
Unknown
From OPS DIrectorate (Pekka): nits: - spell out SNTP in the Abstract - acknowledgement section should be split to a real acknowledgement section, and the regular ISOC funding acknowledgement. - IPR statement could be added. - add a dot at the end of the paragraph in section 2.
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-10-28)
Unknown
The language on IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in this document is acceptable to me. DISCUSS removed.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-01-22)
Unknown
The end of the sentence in Section 3 might want to include a direct reference to the DHCPv6 spec (presumably, [1]).
Ned Freed Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-01-22)
Unknown
No further objection, but I concur with Pekka in believing that handling NTP is at least as important as handling SNTP.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown