Issues with multiple stateful DHCPv6 options
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-03
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (dhc WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ole Trøan , Bernie Volz | ||
| Last updated | 2013-05-08 (Latest revision 2012-11-04) | ||
| Replaces | draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Reviews |
SECDIR Last Call review
(of
-11)
Has Issues
GENART Last Call review
(of
-11)
Ready with Nits
|
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-03.txt
Abstract
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) was not written with the expectation that additional stateful DHCPv6 options would be developed. IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6 shoe-horned the new options for Prefix Delegation into DHCPv6. Implementation experience of the CPE model described in has shown multiple issues with the DHCPv6 protocol in supporting multiple stateful options.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)