%% You should probably cite draft-rhl-dhc-dhcpv6-extensions instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-06,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6/06/},
    author =    {Ren Gang and Lin He and Ying Liu},
    title =     {{DHCPv6 Extension Practices and Considerations}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2020,
    month =     nov,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {IP addresses as the communication identifier bear more and more properties to meet different requirements. The privacy protection, accountability, security, and manageability of networks can be supported by extending the DHCPv6 protocol according to requirements. This document provides current extension practices and typical DHCPv6 server softwares on extensions, defines a DHCPv6 general model, discusses some extension points, and presents extension cases.},
}