DHCPv6 Extension Practices and Considerations
draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-08
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(dhc WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ren Gang , Lin He , Ying Liu | ||
| Last updated | 2021-11-19 | ||
| Replaces | draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-rhl-dhc-dhcpv6-extensions | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
SECDIR Last Call review
(of
-05)
by Christopher Wood
Serious Issues
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Dead WG Document | |
| Associated WG milestone |
|
||
| Document shepherd | Bernie Volz | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2020-02-13 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-rhl-dhc-dhcpv6-extensions | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Éric Vyncke | ||
| Send notices to | Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com> | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
IP addresses assume an increasing number of attributes as communication identifiers to meet different requirements. Privacy protection, accountability, security, and manageability of networks can be supported by extending the DHCPv6 protocol as required. This document provides current extension practices and typical DHCPv6 server software in terms of extensions, defines a general model of DHCPv6, discusses some extension points, and presents extension cases.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)