Secure DHCPv6 Using CGAs
draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 07 (System) Notify list changed from dhc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6@ietf.org to (None)
2013-04-17 07 (System) Document has expired
2013-04-17 07 (System) State changed to Dead from AD is watching::Revised I-D Needed
2013-04-16 07 Ted Lemon
Sheng is going to work on a new proposal that does the same thing without CGAs, and bring it back through the working group.  ...
2013-04-16 07 Ted Lemon State changed to AD is watching::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed
2013-03-13 07 Cindy Morgan Shepherding AD changed to Ted Lemon
2013-02-28 07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-02-28 07 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Stephen Kent.
2013-02-28 07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-02-28 07 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-02-28 07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- I agree with Sean's discuss based on Steve Kent's thorough
secdir review.

- I didn't get why a client would use ...
2013-02-28 07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-02-28 07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

I don't get why a client would use this - if the client
generates a CGA then why does it even use DHCP ...
2013-02-28 07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- I agree with Sean's discuss based on Steve Kent's thorough
secdir review.

- My suggestion for how to fix this is to ...
2013-02-28 07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-02-28 07 Benoit Claise
[Ballot comment]
A COMMENT from the OPS directorate review, take or leave it, but I wanted to share it.

Readability of the document could be ...
2013-02-28 07 Benoit Claise Ballot comment text updated for Benoit Claise
2013-02-28 07 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-02-28 07 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
From the secdir review:

The document does not provide a thorough system-level description of how the security mechanisms are to be used, and ...
2013-02-28 07 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Also from the secdir review:

Section 3 provides a very brief discussion of the vulnerabilities associated with unsecured DHCPv6, and then reviews the ...
2013-02-28 07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-02-27 07 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2013-02-27 07 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Question:
5.2 and 5.3: Is it normal practice to have a separate "Padding" field displayed in the data structure and defined ...
2013-02-27 07 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-02-27 07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]

  The Gen-ART Review by Francis Dupont on 20-Feb-2013 raised a major
  issue, and I have not seen any response from the ...
2013-02-27 07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2013-02-26 07 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]
I think the proposed approach is a good one and support seeing it published.  I do have some issues that I would ...
2013-02-26 07 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-02-26 07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-02-26 07 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
This is a fine idea, and I support it -- certainly no objection to the document in general.  I have two things I ...
2013-02-26 07 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
A few non-blocking comments that I think will improve things:

-- Section 4.2 --
I find the first two paragraphs and their lead-in to ...
2013-02-26 07 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-02-26 07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2013-02-26 07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-02-25 07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2013-02-25 07 Brian Haberman State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-02-25 07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-02-24 07 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Not Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2013-02-22 07 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond ...
2013-02-15 07 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2013-02-15 07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2013-02-15 07 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2013-02-14 07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2013-02-14 07 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2013-02-11 07 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
CC:
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call:  (Secure DHCPv6 Using ...
2013-02-11 07 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-02-11 07 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-02-28
2013-02-11 07 Ralph Droms Last call was requested
2013-02-11 07 Ralph Droms Ballot approval text was generated
2013-02-11 07 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2013-02-11 07 Ralph Droms Last call announcement was generated
2012-12-14 07 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup was changed
2012-12-14 07 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup was generated
2012-12-14 07 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-12-12 07 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
    Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
    is this the ...
2012-12-12 07 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Ted Lemon (ted.lemon@nominum.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-12-12 07 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-12-12 07 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-12-12 07 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-jiang-dhc-secure-dhcpv6
2012-09-14 07 Sheng Jiang New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07.txt
2012-03-12 06 Sheng Jiang New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-06.txt
2012-03-06 05 Sheng Jiang New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-05.txt
2012-01-23 04 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Stephen Kent.
2012-01-05 04 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2011-12-30 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-04.txt
2011-12-18 04 (System) Document has expired
2011-06-16 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-03.txt
2010-12-21 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-02.txt
2010-06-21 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-01.txt
2010-04-12 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-00.txt