%% You should probably cite rfc8582 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-11,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-11},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control/11/},
    author =    {Steve Donovan and Eric Noel},
    title =     {{Diameter Overload Rate Control}},
    pagetotal = 20,
    year =      2019,
    month =     feb,
    day =       11,
    abstract =  {This specification documents an extension to the Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance (DOIC) base solution, which is defined in RFC 7683. This extension adds a new overload-control abatement algorithm. This abatement algorithm allows for a DOIC reporting node to specify a maximum rate at which a DOIC reacting node sends Diameter requests to the DOIC reporting node.},
}