Diameter Routing Message Priority
draft-ietf-dime-drmp-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-08-04
07 (System) RFC published
2016-08-03
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2016-08-01
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2016-07-13
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2016-07-12
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2016-07-08
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2016-07-08
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2016-07-06
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2016-07-06
07 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2016-07-06
07 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2016-07-06
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on WGC
2016-07-05
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on WGC
2016-07-05
07 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2016-07-05
07 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2016-07-05
07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2016-07-05
07 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2016-07-05
07 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2016-06-03
07 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-07.txt
2016-05-31
06 Alissa Cooper [Ballot comment]
Thank you for resolving the issues I raised.
2016-05-31
06 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alissa Cooper has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2016-05-18
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2016-05-18
06 Steve Donovan IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2016-05-18
06 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-06.txt
2016-05-13
05 Meral Shirazipour Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2016-05-11
05 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot comment]
I still think this part needs further clarification mostly regarding applicability and maybe a warning as it could lead to starvation of requests ...
2016-05-11
05 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mirja Kühlewind has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2016-05-10
05 Ben Campbell [Ballot comment]
Thanks for engaging on my previous DISCUSS points and comments.
2016-05-10
05 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ben Campbell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2016-05-10
05 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot discuss]
I fully agree with all discuss comments made by Ben and Alissa. However, the summary here might be that this information might simply ...
2016-05-10
05 Mirja Kühlewind Ballot discuss text updated for Mirja Kühlewind
2016-05-09
05 Gunter Van de Velde Closed request for Last Call review by OPSDIR with state 'No Response'
2016-05-05
05 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Tom Yu.
2016-05-05
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2016-05-05
05 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2016-05-05
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
I disagree with Mirja's DISCUSS point.

In Section 6: excuse my ignorance, but how can priority information be conveyed to non-supporting endpoints ...
2016-05-05
05 Alexey Melnikov Ballot comment text updated for Alexey Melnikov
2016-05-04
05 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2016-05-04
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2016-05-04
05 Alvaro Retana
[Ballot comment]
After reading the document and the threads related to the DISCUSSes, I'm ABSTAINing because I can't see how this mechanism can ...
2016-05-04
05 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2016-05-04
05 Alia Atlas [Ballot comment]
I agree with Mirja's and Alissa's discusses.
2016-05-04
05 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2016-05-04
05 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot comment]
I'd like to see text clarifying the responses to Ben & Alissa's discuss points.
2016-05-04
05 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2016-05-04
05 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
- OLD:

  This also recognizes that more
  work has already taken place for established sessions and, as a
  result, it might ...
2016-05-04
05 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2016-05-04
05 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot discuss]
I fully agree with all discuss comments made by Ben and Alissa. However, the summary here might be that this information might simply ...
2016-05-04
05 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot comment]
Why do you need 15 different priority levels? Wouldn't be two enough for all or your use cases?
2016-05-04
05 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2016-05-03
05 Ben Campbell
[Ballot discuss]
I have a few concerns that I think need some discussion.

1) Priority between applications: The fact that agents can apply priority for ...
2016-05-03
05 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
General: I approached this assuming prioritization would matter only in overload scenarios. But I gather you envision using this in non-overload scenarios? (This ...
2016-05-03
05 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2016-05-03
05 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2016-05-03
05 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot discuss]
(1) Given the two key security threats identified in Section 11 -- that authorized nodes can issue requests with artificially high priority in order ...
2016-05-03
05 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot comment]
Section 11 says: "DRMP gives Diameter nodes the ability to influence which requests are throttled during overload scenarios." But the information is not ...
2016-05-03
05 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2016-05-03
05 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2016-04-28
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 6: excuse my ignorance, but how can priority information be conveyed to non-supporting endpoints (in 2 places)? And what is the ...
2016-04-28
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2016-04-27
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2016-04-26
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2016-04-12
05 Stephen Farrell Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-05-05
2016-04-12
05 Stephen Farrell IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::AD Followup
2016-04-12
05 Stephen Farrell Ballot has been issued
2016-04-12
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2016-04-12
05 Stephen Farrell Created "Approve" ballot
2016-04-12
05 Stephen Farrell Ballot writeup was changed
2016-04-07
05 Lionel Morand Added -05 to session: IETF-95: dime  Fri-1000
2016-04-05
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2016-04-05
05 Steve Donovan IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2016-04-05
05 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05.txt
2016-03-29
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari
2016-03-29
04 Gunter Van de Velde Assignment of request for Last Call review by OPSDIR to Lionel Morand was rejected
2016-03-28
04 Sabrina Tanamal IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Not OK
2016-03-27
04 Stephen Farrell IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup::Revised I-D Needed from Waiting for Writeup
2016-03-25
04 Meral Shirazipour Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2016-03-24
04 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2016-03-21
04 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed
2016-03-21
04 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-dime-drmp-04.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please ...
2016-03-17
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2016-03-15
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Lionel Morand
2016-03-10
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2016-03-10
04 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2016-03-10
04 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org, lionel.morand ...
2016-03-10
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2016-03-10
04 Stephen Farrell Last call was requested
2016-03-10
04 Stephen Farrell Ballot approval text was generated
2016-03-10
04 Stephen Farrell Ballot writeup was generated
2016-03-10
04 Stephen Farrell IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2016-03-10
04 Stephen Farrell Last call announcement was generated
2016-03-10
04 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-04.txt
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand
1. Summary

The document shepherd is Lionel Morand. The responsible Area Director is Stephen Farrell.

This document defines a mechanism that allows Diameter nodes to ...
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Responsible AD changed to Stephen Farrell
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Changed document writeup
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Changed document writeup
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Notification list changed to "Lionel Morand" <lionel.morand@orange.com>
2016-02-25
03 Lionel Morand Document shepherd changed to Lionel Morand
2016-02-24
03 Lionel Morand The version -03 addresses the comments received the WGLC. The document is ready for IETF LC.
2016-02-24
03 Lionel Morand IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2016-02-02
03 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-03.txt
2015-12-23
02 Lionel Morand Due to the Xmas period, the period for comments during the WG last call is set to 4 weeks
2015-12-23
02 Lionel Morand IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2015-11-11
02 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-02.txt
2015-10-12
01 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-01.txt
2015-08-14
00 Lionel Morand This document now replaces draft-donovan-dime-drmp instead of None
2015-08-14
00 Steve Donovan New version available: draft-ietf-dime-drmp-00.txt