Diameter Network Access Server Application
draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14
Yes
(Benoît Claise)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-12-18)
Unknown
- Thank you for section 8.2! (hence the yes:-) - As a side-comment, and not related to this draft at all, we should think about whether it'd be worth a look at the TLS ciphersuites mentioned in 6733 again, now that PFS ciphersuites are generally being more favoured. If say, Diameter/TLS were only starting to be deployed now, it might be worthwhile thinking about key exfiltration attacks and the impact of those, in the same way that the UTA WG are doing for other protocols. That could be done with a small RFC that updated 6733 and basically copied a new set of preferred PFS ciphersuites from one of the UTA documents, once those have firmed up a bit.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown