%% You should probably cite rfc5672 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-07,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-07},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata/07/},
    author =    {Dave Crocker},
    title =     {{RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Update}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2009,
    month =     jun,
    day =       26,
    abstract =  {This document updates RFC 4871, "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures". Specifically, the document clarifies the nature, roles, and relationship of the two DKIM identifier tag values that are candidates for payload delivery to a receiving processing module. The Update is in the style of an Errata entry, albeit a rather long one. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}