E-mail Authentication for Internationalized Mail
draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-05
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 8616.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | John R. Levine | ||
| Last updated | 2019-04-11 (Latest revision 2019-04-05) | ||
| Replaces | draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
I18NDIR IETF Last Call review
(of
-03)
by Martin Dürst
Ready w/issues
GENART IETF Last Call review
(of
-03)
by Tim Evens
Ready w/nits
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Kurt Andersen | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2019-02-26 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 8616 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date |
(None)
Needs a YES. Needs 8 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass. |
||
| Responsible AD | Alexey Melnikov | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-05
Network Working Group J. Levine
Internet-Draft Taughannock Networks
Updates: 6376, 7208, 7489 (if approved) April 5, 2019
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: October 7, 2019
E-mail Authentication for Internationalized Mail
draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-05
Abstract
SPF (RFC7208), DKIM (RFC6376), and DMARC (RFC7489) enable a domain
owner to publish e-mail authentication and policy information in the
DNS. In internationalized e-mail, domain names can occur both as
U-labels and A-labels. This specification updates the SPF, DKIM, and
DMARC specifications to clarify which form of internationalized
domain names to use in those specifications.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 7, 2019.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft EAI Authentication April 2019
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. General principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. SPF and internationalized mail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. DKIM and internationalized mail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. DMARC and internationalized mail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Appendix A. Change history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Introduction
SPF [RFC7208], DKIM [RFC6376], and DMARC [RFC7489] enable a domain
owner to publish e-mail authentication and policy information in the
DNS. SPF primarily publishes information about what host addresses
are authorized to send mail for a domain. DKIM places cryptographic
signatures on e-mail messages, with the validation keys published in
the DNS. DMARC publishes policy information related to the domain in
the From: header of e-mail messages.
In conventional e-mail, all domain names are ASCII in all contexts so
there is no question about the representation of the domain names.
All internationalized domain names are represented as A-labels
[RFC5890] in message headers, in SMTP sessions, and in the DNS.
Internationalized mail [RFC6530] allows U-labels in SMTP sessions
[RFC6531] and in message headers [RFC6532].
Every U-label is equivalent to an A-label, so in principle the choice
of label format will not cause ambiguities. But in practice,
consistent use of label formats will make it more likely that mail
senders' and receivers' code interoperates.
Internationalized mail also allows UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters
in the local parts of mailbox names, which were historically only
ASCII.
2. Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft EAI Authentication April 2019
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The term IDN, for Internationalized Domain Name, refers to a domain
name containing either U-labels or A-labels.
Since DMARC is not currently a standards track protocol, this
specification offers advice rather than requirements for DMARC.
3. General principles
In headers in EAI mail messages, domain names that were restricted to
ASCII can now be U-labels, and mailbox local parts can be UTF-8.
Header names and other text intended primarily to be interpreted by
computers rather than read by people remains ASCII.
Strings stored in DNS records remain ASCII since there is no way to
tell whether a client retrieving a DNS record expects an EAI or an
ASCII result. When a domain name found in a mail header includes
U-labels, those labels are translated to A-labels before being looked
up in the DNS, as described in [RFC5891].
4. SPF and internationalized mail
SPF [RFC7208] uses two identities from the SMTP session, the host
name in the EHLO command, and the domain in the address in the MAIL
FROM command. Since the EHLO command precedes the server response
that tells whether the server supports the SMTPUTF8 extension, an IDN
argument MUST be represented as an A-label. An IDN in MAIL FROM can
be either U-labels or A-labels.
All U-labels MUST be converted to A-labels before being used for an
SPF validation. This includes both the original DNS lookup,
described in Section 3 of [RFC7208] and the macro expansion of
domain-spec described in section 7. Section 4.3 of [RFC7208] states
that all IDNs in an SPF DNS record MUST be A-labels; this rule is
unchanged since any SPF record can be used to authorize either EAI or
conventional mail.
SPF macros %{s} and %{l} expand the local-part of the sender's
mailbox. If the local-part contains non-ASCII characters, terms that
include %{s} or %{l} do not match anything. (Note that unlike
U-labels in domains, there is no way to rewrite non-ASCII local parts
into ASCII.)
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft EAI Authentication April 2019
5. DKIM and internationalized mail
DKIM [RFC6376] specifies a message header that contains a
cryptographic message signature and a DNS record that contains the
validation key.
Section 2.11 of [RFC6376] defines dkim-quoted-printable. Its
definition is modified in messages with internationalized headers so
that non-ASCII UTF-8 characters need not be quoted. The ABNF for
dkim-safe-char in those messages is replaced by the following, adding
non-ASCII UTF-8 characters from [RFC3629]:
dkim-safe-char = %x21-3A / %x3C / %x3E-7E /
UTF8-2 / UTF8-3 / UTF8-4
; '!' - ':', '<', '>' - '~', non-ASCII
UTF8-2 = <Defined in Section 4 of RFC 3629>
UTF8-3 = <Defined in Section 4 of RFC 3629>
UTF8-4 = <Defined in Section 4 of RFC 3629>
Section 3.5 of [RFC6376] states that IDNs in the d=, i=, and s= tags
of a DKIM-Signature header MUST be encoded as A-labels. This rule is
relaxed only for internationalized messages headers [RFC6532] so IDNs
SHOULD be represented as U-labels. This provides improved
consistency with other headers. (A-labels remain valid to allow a
transition from older software.) The set of allowable characters in
the local-part of an i= tag is extended in the same fashion as local
parts of e-mail addresses as described in section 3.2 of [RFC6532].
When computing or verifying the hash in a DKIM signature as described
in section 3.7, the hash MUST use the domain name in the format it
occurs in the header.
Section 3.4.2 of [RFC6376] describes relaxed header canonicalization.
Its first step converts all header field names from upper case to
lower case. Field names are restricted to printable ASCII (see
[RFC5322] section 3.6.8) so this case conversion remains ASCII case
conversion.
DKIM key records, described in section 3.6.1, do not contain domain
names, so there is no change to their specification.
6. DMARC and internationalized mail
DMARC [RFC7489] defines a policy language that domain owners can
specify for the domain of the address in a RFC5322.From header.
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft EAI Authentication April 2019
Section 6.6.1 specifies, somewhat imprecisely, how IDNs in the
RFC5322.From address domain are to be handled. That section is
updated to say that all U-labels in the domain are converted to
A-labels before further processing. Section 7.1 is similarly updated
to say that all U-labels in domains being handled are converted to
A-labels before further processing.
DMARC policy records, described in sections 6.3 and 7.1, can contain
e-mail addresses in the rua and ruf tags. Since a policy record can
be used for both internationalized and conventional mail, those
addresses still have to be conventional addresses, not
internationalized addresses.
7. IANA Considerations
This document makes no request of IANA.
8. Security Considerations
E-mail is subject to a vast range of threats and abuses. This
document attempts to slightly mitigate some of them but does not, as
far as the author knows, add any new ones. The updates to SPF, DKIM,
and DMARC are intended to allow the respective specifications work as
reliably on internationalized mail as they do on ASCII mail, so that
applications that use them, such as some kinds of spam and phish
filtering, can work more reliably on internationalized mail.
9. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.
[RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5322, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5322>.
[RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for
Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework",
RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft EAI Authentication April 2019
[RFC5891] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names in
Applications (IDNA): Protocol", RFC 5891,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5891, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5891>.
[RFC6376] Crocker, D., Ed., Hansen, T., Ed., and M. Kucherawy, Ed.,
"DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", STD 76,
RFC 6376, DOI 10.17487/RFC6376, September 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6376>.
[RFC6530] Klensin, J. and Y. Ko, "Overview and Framework for
Internationalized Email", RFC 6530, DOI 10.17487/RFC6530,
February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6530>.
[RFC6531] Yao, J. and W. Mao, "SMTP Extension for Internationalized
Email", RFC 6531, DOI 10.17487/RFC6531, February 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6531>.
[RFC6532] Yang, A., Steele, S., and N. Freed, "Internationalized
Email Headers", RFC 6532, DOI 10.17487/RFC6532, February
2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6532>.
[RFC7208] Kitterman, S., "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for
Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1", RFC 7208,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7208, April 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7208>.
[RFC7489] Kucherawy, M., Ed. and E. Zwicky, Ed., "Domain-based
Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance
(DMARC)", RFC 7489, DOI 10.17487/RFC7489, March 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7489>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
Appendix A. Change history
04 to 05 editorial nits
03 to 04 remove dangling A-R reference, add more i18nish and
security goodness
02 to 03 minor edits per Alexey
01 to 02 update references
00 to 01 Relaxed canon, Typos
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft EAI Authentication April 2019
00 First WG version
Author's Address
John Levine
Taughannock Networks
PO Box 727
Trumansburg, NY 14886
Email: standards@taugh.com
URI: http://jl.ly
Levine Expires October 7, 2019 [Page 7]