Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Failure Reporting
draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-25

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, andy@hxr.us, barryleiba@computer.org, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org, dmarc@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, superuser@gmail.com
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Failure Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-24.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance
   (DMARC) Failure Reporting'
  (draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-24.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
Reporting & Conformance Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Andy Newton and Orie Steele.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting/

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance
   (DMARC) is a mechanism by which a Domain Owner can request feedback
   about email messages using their domain in the From: address field.
   This document describes "failure reports," or "failed message
   reports", which provide details about individual messages that failed
   to authenticate according to the DMARC mechanism.

Working Group Summary

   The DMARC working group has suffered from lack of progress for many
   years. After the group delivered on two milestones, it was shuttered
   without the realization that there was a dependency on this document.
   Once rechartered, the group had to find consensus about proceeding
   with this document. The decision was made to proceed.

Document Quality

   Implementations exist.  OpenDKIM is one of them; the rest are commercial.
   There were no substantial changes to the document following
   Last Call review.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Murray Kucherawy. The
   Responsible Area Director is Andy Newton.

IANA Note

  The sole IANA action requested is trivial and appears to be well formed.

RFC Editor Note