%% You should probably cite rfc9091 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dmarc-psd-06,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/06/},
    author =    {Scott Kitterman},
    title =     {{DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling. The design of DMARC presumes that domain names represent either nodes in the tree below which registrations occur, or nodes where registrations have occurred; it does not permit a domain name to have both of these properties simultaneously. Since its deployment in 2015, use of DMARC has shown a clear need for the ability to express policy for these domains as well. Domains at which registrations can occur are referred to as Public Suffix Domains (PSDs). This document describes an extension to DMARC to enable DMARC functionality for PSDs. This document also seeks to address implementations that consider a domain on a public Suffix list to be ineligible for DMARC enforcement.},
}