MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 Mobile Node Identifier Option
The information below is for an old version of the document.
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 8371.
|Authors||Charles E. Perkins , Vijay Devarapalli|
|Last updated||2015-04-27 (Latest revision 2015-04-22)|
|RFC stream||Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)|
SECDIR Last Call review (of -04) Has Nits
GENART Last Call review (of -04) Ready with Issues
INTDIR Early review (of -03) Ready with Nits
|Additional resources||Mailing list discussion|
|Stream||WG state||WG Document|
|IESG||IESG state||I-D Exists|
|Send notices to||(None)|
Distributed Mobility Management [dmm] C. Perkins Internet-Draft Futurewei Expires: October 24, 2015 V. Devarapalli Vasona Networks April 22, 2015 MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 Mobile Node Identifier Option draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt Abstract Additional Identifier Types are proposed for use with the Mobile Node Identifier Option for MIPv6 (RFC 4283). Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on October 24, 2015. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 1] Internet-Draft MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 April 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. New Mobile Node Identifier Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1. Introduction The Mobile Node Identifier Option for MIPv6 [RFC4283] has proved to be a popular design tool for providing identifiers for mobile nodes during authentication procedures with AAA protocols such as Diameter [RFC3588]. To date, only a single type of identifier has been specified, namely the MN NAI. Other types of identifiers are in common use, and even referenced in RFC 4283. In this document, we propose adding some basic types that are commonly in use in various telecommunications standards, including the IMSI, P-TMSI, IMEI, GUTI, and IEEE MAC-layer addresses. In addition, we include the IPv6 address itself as a legitimate mobile node identifier. 2. New Mobile Node Identifier Types The following types of identifiers are commonly used to identify mobile nodes. For each type, references are provided with full details on the format of the type of identifer. EPC supports several encoding systems or schemes including o RFID-GID (Global Identifier), o RFID-SGTIN (Serialized Global Trade Item Number), o RFID-SSCC (Serial Shipping Container), o RFID-GLN (Global Location Number), o RFID-GRAI (Global Returnable Asset Identifier), o RFID-DOD (Department of Defense) and o RFID-GIAI (Global Individual Asset Identifier). For each RFID scheme except GID, there are two variations: a 64-bit scheme (for example, GLN-64) and a 96-bit scheme (GLN-96). GID has only a 96-bit scheme. Within each scheme, an EPC identifier can be represented in a binary form or other forms such as URI. The following list includes the above RFID types as well as various other common identifiers and several different types of DUIDs. Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 2] Internet-Draft MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 April 2015 o IPv6 Address [RFC2373] o IMSI [ThreeGPP-IDS] o P-TMSI [ThreeGPP-IDS] o GUTI [ThreeGPP-IDS] o EUI-48 address [IEEE802] o EUI-64 address [IEEE802] o DUID-LLT [RFC3315] o DUID-EN [RFC3315] o DUID-LL [RFC3315] o DUID-UUID [RFC6355] o 12-15 reserved o 16 reserved o RFID-SGTIN-64 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-SSCC-64 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-GLN-64 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-GRAI-64 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-DOD-64 [RFID-DoD-96] o RFID-GIAI-64 [EPC-Tag-Data] o 23 reserved o RFID-GID-96 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-SGTIN-96 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-SSCC-96 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-GLN-96 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-GRAI-96 [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-DOD-96 [RFID-DoD-96] o RFID-GIAI-96 [EPC-Tag-Data] o 31 reserved o RFID-GID-URI [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-SGTIN-URI [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-SSCC-URI [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-GLN-URI [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-GRAI-URI [EPC-Tag-Data] o RFID-DOD-URI [RFID-DoD-96] o RFID-GIAI-URI [EPC-Tag-Data] o 39-255 reserved 3. Security Considerations This document does not introduce any security mechanisms, and does not have any impact on existing security mechanisms. Insofar as the selection of a security association may be dependent on the exact form of a mobile node identifier, additional specification may be necessary when the new identifier types are employed with the general AAA mechanisms for mobile node authorizations. Some identifiers (e.g., IMSI) are considered to be private information. If used in the MNID extension as defined in this document, the packet including the MNID extension should be encrypted Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 3] Internet-Draft MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 April 2015 so that personal information or trackable identifiers would not be inadvertently disclosed to passive observers. Moreover, MNIDs containing sensitive identifiers might only be used for signaling during initial network entry. Subsequent binding update exchanges would then rely on a temporary identifier allocated during the initial network entry. 4. IANA Considerations The new mobile node identifier types defined in the document should be assigned values from the "Mobile Node Identifier Option Subtypes" registry. The following values should be assigned. Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 4] Internet-Draft MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 April 2015 New Mobile Node Identifier Types +-----------------+------------------------+ | Identifier Type | Identifier Type Number | +-----------------+------------------------+ | IPv6 Address | 2 | | IMSI | 3 | | P-TMSI | 4 | | EUI-48 address | 5 | | EUI-64 address | 6 | | GUTI | 7 | | DUID-LLT | 8 | | DUID-EN | 9 | | DUID-LL | 10 | | DUID-UUID | 11 | | | 12-15 reserved | | | 16 reserved | | RFID-SGTIN-64 | 17 | | RFID-SSCC-64 | 18 | | RFID-GLN-64 | 19 | | RFID-GRAI-64 | 20 | | RFID-DOD-64 | 21 | | RFID-GIAI-64 | 22 | | | 23 reserved | | RFID-GID-96 | 24 | | RFID-SGTIN-96 | 25 | | RFID-SSCC-96 | 26 | | RFID-GLN-96 | 27 | | RFID-GRAI-96 | 28 | | RFID-DOD-96 | 29 | | RFID-GIAI-96 | 30 | | | 31 reserved | | RFID-GID-URI | 32 | | RFID-SGTIN-URI | 33 | | RFID-SSCC-URI | 34 | | RFID-GLN-URI | 35 | | RFID-GRAI-URI | 36 | | RFID-DOD-URI | 37 | | RFID-GIAI-URI | 38 | | | 39-255 reserved | +-----------------+------------------------+ Table 1 See Section 2 for details about the identifer types. Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 5] Internet-Draft MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 April 2015 5. References 5.1. Normative References [RFC2373] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998. [RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003. [RFC4122] Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, "A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace", RFC 4122, July 2005. [RFC4283] Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K. Chowdhury, "Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)", RFC 4283, November 2005. [RFC4285] Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K. Chowdhury, "Authentication Protocol for Mobile IPv6", RFC 4285, January 2006. [RFC6355] Narten, T. and J. Johnson, "Definition of the UUID-Based DHCPv6 Unique Identifier (DUID-UUID)", RFC 6355, August 2011. 5.2. Informative References [EPC-Tag-Data] EPCglobal Inc., , "EPC(TM) Generation 1 Tag Data Standards Version 1.1 Rev.1.27 http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/kc/epcglobal/tds/ tds_1_1_rev_1_27-standard-20050510.pdf", January 2005. [IEEE802] IEEE, , "IEEE Std 802: IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Networks: Overview and Architecture", 2001. [RFC3588] Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588, September 2003. [RFID-DoD-96] Department of Defense, , "United States Department of Defense Suppliers Passive RFID Information Guide (Version 15.0)", January 2010. Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 6] Internet-Draft MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 April 2015 [ThreeGPP-IDS] 3rd Generation Partnership Project, , "3GPP Technical Specification 23.003 V8.4.0: Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Numbering, addressing and identification (Release 8)", March 2009. Authors' Addresses Charles E. Perkins Futurewei Inc. 2330 Central Expressway Santa Clara, CA 95050 USA Phone: +1-408-330-4586 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Vijay Devarapalli Vasona Networks 2900 Lakeside Drive, Suite 180 Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA Perkins & Devarapalli Expires October 24, 2015 [Page 7]