Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from dnsext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal@ietf.org to (None)
2013-07-03
10 (System) RFC published
2013-07-02
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-06-27
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-06-05
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-05-21
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-05-20
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2013-05-20
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-05-20
10 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-05-20
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-05-20
10 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-05-17
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-05-17
10 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-05-17
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-05-17
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-05-17
10 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-05-16
10 Ted Lemon State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-05-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-26
10 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
After discussion, it sounds like we're in agreement that some clarification on why a client MUST NOT send DAU/DHU/N3U if ...
2013-04-26
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-04-25
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation
2013-04-25
10 Richard Barnes
[Ballot comment]
Why is there a need for separate DHU and N3U options?  It seems like if an implementation has a hash, then it ...
2013-04-25
10 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] Position for Richard Barnes has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-04-25
10 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty.
2013-04-24
10 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-04-24
10 Richard Barnes
[Ballot discuss]
1. The combination algorithm for recursive resolvers seems backwards; it results in a list of algorithms such that at least one of the ...
2013-04-24
10 Richard Barnes
[Ballot comment]
Why is there a need for separate DHU and N3U options?  It seems like if an implementation has a hash, then it ...
2013-04-24
10 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-04-24
10 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Overall issue: I do not understand the requirement that a client MUST NOT send DAU, DHU and/or N3U if DO is not ...
2013-04-24
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
Section 5, paragraph 2: s/DNSSEC-OK (OK)/DNSSEC-OK (DO)
2013-04-24
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-04-24
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-04-23
10 Meral Shirazipour Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2013-04-23
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-04-23
10 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
Stephen's idea for text about an attacker exploiting client's that continue to use weak algorithms is a good idea.
2013-04-23
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-04-22
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
There seemed to be a lot of UOFU TLAs and FLAs, hopefully these are all RFC Ed SEs.
2013-04-22
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-04-22
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- abstract: the draft does stuff, it doesn't "set out to" do
stuff, at least not anymore

- section 4: not sure if the ...
2013-04-22
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-04-22
10 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-04-21
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-04-18
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-04-18
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-04-17
10 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-04-16
10 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
This seems more like an Experimental document, but I will not stand in the way of the WG's view of its status.
2013-04-16
10 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-04-13
10 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Not OK
2013-04-12
10 Ted Lemon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-04-25
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot has been issued
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Created "Approve" ballot
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-08
10 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10.txt
2013-04-04
09 Meral Shirazipour Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Almost Ready. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2013-04-03
09 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-03
09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-04-01
09 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-01
09 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed
2013-04-01
09 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond ...
2013-03-21
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-03-21
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-03-21
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2013-03-21
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2013-03-20
09 Cindy Morgan IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-03-20
09 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <dnsext@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf ...
2013-03-20
09 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-03-20
09 Ted Lemon Last call was requested
2013-03-20
09 Ted Lemon Last call announcement was generated
2013-03-20
09 Ted Lemon Ballot approval text was generated
2013-03-20
09 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was generated
2013-03-20
09 Ted Lemon
The document looks solid.  One proposal relating to the server considerations section:

OLD
If the options are present but the DNSSEC-OK (OK) bit is ...
2013-03-20
09 Ted Lemon State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2013-03-13
09 Cindy Morgan Shepherding AD changed to Ted Lemon
2013-02-11
09 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2013-02-08
09 Amy Vezza
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?  Why is this the proper type of ...
2013-02-08
09 Amy Vezza Note changed to 'Patrik Faltstrom (paf@frobbit.se) is the Document Shepherd'
2013-02-08
09 Amy Vezza Note added 'Patrik Faltstrom is the Document Shepherd'
2013-02-08
09 Amy Vezza Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2013-02-08
09 Amy Vezza IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-09-24
09 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09.txt
2012-08-14
08 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-08.txt
2012-06-14
07 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-07.txt
2012-05-01
06 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-06.txt
2012-03-26
05 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txt
2012-03-06
04 Scott Rose New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-04.txt
2012-01-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-03.txt
2011-07-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-02.txt
2011-05-26
03 Ólafur Guðmundsson Patrik Fältström started 4 week LC on May 25'th
2011-05-26
03 Ólafur Guðmundsson IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2011-05-25
03 Ólafur Guðmundsson IETF state changed to WG Document from WG Document
2011-05-25
03 Ólafur Guðmundsson Document sheperd is Patrik Faltsrtrom Document will start last call soon
2011-05-25
03 Ólafur Guðmundsson Annotation tag Other - see Comment Log set.
2011-03-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-01.txt
2010-11-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-00.txt