A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
(Ron Bonica) Yes
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
Benoit Claise No Objection
(Wesley Eddy) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Stephen Farrell No Objection
Comment (2012-07-17 for -08)
- 1.1: Is this really for "users" to evaluate the strength of DNSSEC? I don't know any users who'd do that. Maybe admins of some sort. - PKI definition: I'd love if you deleted non-repudiation since a PKI, and DNSSEC in particular, doesn't get you that. (By itself.)
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Barry Leiba) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2012-07-19 for -08)
From the shepherd writeup: > There was a concern about a possible copyright issue, but only in > respect to a pre-RFC5378 RFC. Parts of RFC 3647 have been used in the > draft, so the authors have contacted the authors of RFC 3647 requesting > permission to use text from it. All who have replied (four out of five) > have given that permission. Response from Tomofumi Okubo: "We received the permission from the 5th author of RFC3647 shortly after the writeup was submitted." So this former DISCUSS is now cleared.
(Pete Resnick) No Objection
(Robert Sparks) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection
(spt) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2012-10-02 for -10)
Thanks for addressing my discuss/comment positions.