(1) The RFC being requested in Proposed Standard, and this is correct.
(2)
Technical Summary:
This document extends the use of DNS NOTIFY (RFC 1996) beyond
conventional zone transfer hints, bringing the benefits of ad-hoc
notifications to DNS delegation maintenance in general. Use cases
include DNSSEC bootstrapping and key rollovers hints, and quicker
changes to a delegation's NS record set.
Working Group Summary:
Initially there were two different drafts discussing possible solutions. The
Working Group suggested the authors combine their work into one document, which
they did. Consensus has been very solid.
Document Quality:
Section 7 lists an example implementation, and the authors have been working
with others to deploy this.
Personnel:
Document Shepherd: Tim Wicinski
Responsible Area Director: Warren Kumari
(3) The Document Shepherd did a detailed review of the document
for content as well as simple editorial checks (spelling/grammar).
The shepherd feels the document is ready for publication.
(4) The Document Shepherd has no concerns on the depth or breadth of the
reviews.
(5) no broader review needed besides the DNS directorate reviews.
(6) There are no concerns from the document shepherd.
(7) No IPR
(8) No IPR
(9) WG Consensus was solid.
(10) There has been no appeals.
(11) All nits found have been addressed by the authors.
(12) No formal review needed
(13) All references have been identified as normative or informative.
(14) All normative references are in a clear state.
(15) There are no downward normative references
(16) This RFC will not change any existing RFCs.
(17) The document shepherd confirmed the consistency and references of the IANA
Considerations section are accurate.
(18) There is a new registry "DSYNC Scheme Registration" which requires Expert
Review. Document has suggested procedures for Expert Review
(19) N/A
(20) No Yang