%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-06 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/04/},
    author =    {Wes Hardaker and Warren Kumari},
    title =     {{Deprecate usage of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC}},
    pagetotal = 5,
    year =      2025,
    month =     mar,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {This document retires the use of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC. RFC5933 (now historic) defined the use of GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms with DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC). This document updates RFC5933 by deprecating the use of ECC-GOST. {[}RFC Editor: please remove this before publication: It is unclear if updating RFC5933 (a Historic document) is the correct thing to do or not. We did it so that it shows up in Datatracker and similar, but this may be a mistake. We are happy to change this if the RFC Editor / IESG / whoever thinks this is a bad idea.{]}},
}