Deprecate usage of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC
draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-04

Yes

Gorry Fairhurst
Paul Wouters
Éric Vyncke

No Objection

Erik Kline
Mohamed Boucadair

No Record

Andy Newton
Deb Cooley
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mahesh Jethanandani
Mike Bishop
Orie Steele
Roman Danyliw

Summary: Needs 5 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.

Gorry Fairhurst
Yes
Comment (2025-04-27) Sent 
Thank you for preparing this short and clear document.

The abstract mentions “ECC-GOST” “DNSSEC” in the first line, it would be helpful to define each when they are first used.
Paul Wouters
Yes
Comment (2025-03-06 for -03) Sent 
       This document retires the use of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC.

I know ECC-GOST is the mnemonic for value 12, but I think it is confusing since there is another GOST that is also ECC?
Maybe say:

      retures the use of GOST R 34.10-2001 (mnemonic "ECC-GOST")

In the Security or Operational considerations, it would be mentioned this was never deployed beyond a few test zones and the Russian NIC?
And it should say those using it fall back from DNSSEC to DNS, but that is not a big concern because it never saw any real deployment.
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment (2025-03-06 for -03) Not sent 
   This document is part of a group of 3 I-D. I suggest to start
   reviewing draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-07 first.
Erik Kline
No Objection
Mohamed Boucadair
No Objection
Comment (2025-05-11) Sent 
Hi Wes/Warren,

Thank you for effort put into this specification.

Please find below some comments:

# Update

CURRENT:
   Updates: 5933 (if approved)

The update to 5933 is not needed here given that the registry already tags 12 as deprecated.

# Why a separate document?

It is tempting to ask why this is not handled as part of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624, though.

Cheers,
Med
Andy Newton
No Record
Deb Cooley
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
Ketan Talaulikar
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Mike Bishop
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record