%% You should probably cite rfc8490 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-dnsop-session-signal-09, number = {draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-09}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal/09/}, author = {Ray Bellis and Stuart Cheshire and John Dickinson and Sara Dickinson and Ted Lemon and Tom Pusateri}, title = {{DNS Stateful Operations}}, pagetotal = 53, year = 2018, month = may, day = 16, abstract = {This document defines a new DNS OPCODE for DNS Stateful Operations (DSO). DSO messages communicate operations within persistent stateful sessions, using type-length-value (TLV) syntax. Three TLVs are defined that manage session timeouts, termination, and encryption padding, and a framework is defined for extensions to enable new stateful operations. This document updates RFC 1035 by adding a new DNS header opcode and result code which has different message semantics. This document updates RFC 7766 by redefining a session, providing new guidance on connection re-use, and providing a new mechanism for handling session idle timeouts.}, }