Ballot for draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
# Andy Newton, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-12 CC @anewton1998 * line numbers: - https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-12.txt&submitcheck=True * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Thanks to the Reviewers Many thanks to Barry Lieba for the ARTART review. ## Comments I am balloting "Yes" on this draft and concur with Paul Wouters: "Thanks for the draft. I wish we had done this years ago when the idea was first brought up".
Hi Ray, all, Thank you for the discussion and changes made in [1]. These looks good to me and addresses comments in my previous ballot [2]. Cheers, Med [1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-12&url2=draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-14&difftype=--html [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/HauqxyB_GbDcUXUUTMP1JR4L6BA/
Thanks for the draft. I wish we had done this years ago when the idea was first brought up (although to use of _prefix has diminished its use case a bit)
Thanks to Yoav Nir for their secdir review.
Thank you to Stewart Bryant for the GENART review.