%% You should probably cite rfc8783 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-dots-data-channel-11, number = {draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-11}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel/11/}, author = {Tirumaleswar Reddy.K and Mohamed Boucadair and Kaname Nishizuka and Liang Xia and Prashanth Patil and Andrew Mortensen and Nik Teague}, title = {{Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel}}, pagetotal = 31, year = 2017, month = dec, day = 18, abstract = {The document specifies a Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) data channel used for bulk exchange of data not easily or appropriately communicated through the DOTS signal channel under attack conditions. This is a companion document to the DOTS signal channel specification. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Please update these statements with the RFC number to be assigned to this document: o "This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;" o "RFC XXXX: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel"; o reference: RFC XXXX}, }