%% You should probably cite rfc8783 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dots-data-channel-13,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-13},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel/13/},
    author =    {Tirumaleswar Reddy.K and Mohamed Boucadair and Kaname Nishizuka and Liang Xia and Prashanth Patil and Andrew Mortensen and Nik Teague},
    title =     {{Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel Specification}},
    pagetotal = 40,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {The document specifies a Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) data channel used for bulk exchange of data that cannot easily or appropriately communicated through the DOTS signal channel under attack conditions. This is a companion document to the DOTS signal channel specification. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Please update these statements with the RFC number to be assigned to this document: o "This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;" o "RFC XXXX: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel Specification"; o reference: RFC XXXX Please update this statement with the RFC number to be assigned to the following documents: o "RFC YYYY: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification"; o "RFC ZZZZ: Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model";},
}