%% You should probably cite rfc8782 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-dots-signal-channel-22, number = {draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-22}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel/22/}, author = {Tirumaleswar Reddy.K and Mohamed Boucadair and Prashanth Patil and Andrew Mortensen and Nik Teague}, title = {{Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification}}, pagetotal = 89, year = 2018, month = aug, day = 7, abstract = {This document specifies the DOTS signal channel, a protocol for signaling the need for protection against Distributed Denial-of- Service (DDoS) attacks to a server capable of enabling network traffic mitigation on behalf of the requesting client. A companion document defines the DOTS data channel, a separate reliable communication layer for DOTS management and configuration purposes. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Please update these statements within the document with the RFC number to be assigned to this document: o "This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;" o "RFC XXXX: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification"; o "\textbar{} {[}RFCXXXX{]} \textbar{}" o reference: RFC XXXX Please update TBD statements with the port number to be assigned to DOTS Signal Channel Protocol. Also, please update the "revision" date of the YANG module.}, }