|Document||Type||Expired Internet-Draft (drums WG)|
|Stream||Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)|
Expired & archivedplain text pdf htmlized bibtex
|Stream||WG state||WG Document|
|Document shepherd||No shepherd assigned|
|Send notices to||(None)|
This is a candidate proposal for one way which the problems with the reply-to header in email could be resolved. Under no circumstances should this be implemented as it is only a candidate for a solution and no decision has yet been made. This proposal distinguishes the different incompatible uses of the Reply-To header with a new Reply-To-Meaning header. This has the advantage of being relatively simple, not invalidating most current practices and allowing mail user agents to present more predictable user interfaces.
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)