Displaying Downgraded Messages for Email Address Internationalization
draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-03
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
03 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen |
2010-01-15
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
2010-01-14
|
03 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC |
2010-01-14
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2010-01-14
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2010-01-14
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2010-01-14
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza |
2010-01-14
|
03 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pasi Eronen |
2009-12-09
|
03 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot discuss] (Updated for version -03) The description of the downgrading algorithm in version -03 is much easier to understand than before. However, there appears … [Ballot discuss] (Updated for version -03) The description of the downgrading algorithm in version -03 is much easier to understand than before. However, there appears to be one bug: in Section 3.2.2, step 2, the "skip to step 9" cannot be correct, right? (The comparison steps are especially important for From/Sender/To; the current text would apply them only to the relatively unimportant Resent-* headers...) (And yes, I did notice there's an RFC Editor note about this step; but requiring the comparison steps for unimportant headers, and making them optional for the important ones, doesn't sound correct..) |
2009-12-01
|
03 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2009-12-01
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-03.txt |
2009-10-09
|
03 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-10-08 |
2009-10-08
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Sam Weiler. |
2009-10-08
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
2009-10-08
|
03 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel |
2009-10-08
|
03 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2009-10-08
|
03 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
2009-10-07
|
03 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2009-10-07
|
03 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks |
2009-10-07
|
03 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2009-10-06
|
03 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot discuss] I have reviewed draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-02, and have couple of questions/concerns that I'd like to discuss before recommending approval of the document: - I … [Ballot discuss] I have reviewed draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-02, and have couple of questions/concerns that I'd like to discuss before recommending approval of the document: - I found the algorithm in Section 4 extremely difficult to understand. For example, in Step 2 one could assume the generated header fields are added to the "edit space" -- but the example later suggests that's probably not the case. And it's very unclear why Step 6 applies also to "Address Header Fields' Preservation Header Fields", or what it does for them (I thought those are already processed by steps 1...5). I'd suggest some rewriting here to add clarity. - Section 5 says hiding the information from the actual header fields isn't a problem if the comparison done in step 4 succeeds. But this step applies only to address header fields, right? What about non-address header fields? |
2009-10-06
|
03 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
2009-10-06
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2009-09-26
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-26
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-10-08 by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-26
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-26
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | Ballot has been issued by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-26
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | Created "Approve" ballot |
2009-09-23
|
03 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2009-09-18
|
03 | Amanda Baber | IANA comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2009-09-10
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Weiler |
2009-09-10
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Weiler |
2009-09-09
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2009-09-09
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2009-09-09
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-09
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | Last Call was requested by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-09
|
03 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2009-09-09
|
03 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2009-09-09
|
03 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2009-09-08
|
03 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2009-09-08
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-02.txt |
2009-09-02
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | [Note]: 'Harald Alvestrand agreed to shepherd the document' added by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-02
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD is watching by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-08-31
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | Harald Alvestrand agreed to shepherd the document |
2009-08-31
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | Draft Added by Alexey Melnikov in state AD is watching |
2009-03-09
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-01.txt |
2008-10-17
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-00.txt |