IMAP Support for UTF-8
draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-09
Yes
No Objection
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2009-09-10)
Unknown
David Black suggested in GenArt review: While not strictly a security consideration, it would be useful for section 11 to point out the potential for user confusion caused by SEARCH command match strings that have different UTF-8 representations but display identically or similarly (strings that look like they should match don't). Barry Leiba suggested: The UTF8=ONLY capability implies the UTF8 base capability, the UTF8=ALL capability and the UTF8=APPEND capability. A server which advertises UTF8=ONLY need not advertise the three implicit capabilities. Oy. This makes parsing the capability string complicated, and should be earlier in the document. It'd be good to make this clear at the beginning, when the UTF8 capability is first mentioned.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was No Record, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-09-10)
Unknown
Nit at the level of an observation: Would be bice if the first section in the document was the Introduction, and if the Introduction was a little less terse.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-09-08)
Unknown
Why is this going for Experimental instead of PS? Section 3.1., paragraph 7: > would be the same as if other syntacticly valid but semantically Nit: s/syntacticly/syntactically/ Section 3.4., paragraph 1: > "LIST-EXTENEDED" [RFC5258] capability, the server MUST support the Nit: s/"LIST-EXTENEDED"/"LIST-EXTENDED"/
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-09-08)
Unknown
Appendix B (Acknowledgments) still says TBD.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown