%% You should probably cite rfc5223 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery/03/},
    author =    {James Polk and Hannes Tschofenig and Henning Schulzrinne},
    title =     {{Discovering Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Servers Using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)}},
    pagetotal = 8,
    year =      2008,
    month =     may,
    day =       29,
    abstract =  {The Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol describes an XML- based protocol for mapping service identifiers and geospatial or civic location information to service contact Uniform Resource Locators (URLs). LoST servers can be located anywhere, but a placement closer to the end host, e.g., in the access network, is desirable. In disaster situations with intermittent network connectivity, such a LoST server placement provides benefits regarding the resiliency of emergency service communication. This document describes how a LoST client can discover a LoST server using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}