Ballot for draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 22 and is now closed.
Thank you for quick handling of my DISCUSS points. One nit: in 14.1: Contact: Apps Area Working Group (apps-discuss@ietf.org) This should probably be art@ietf.org
Minor comments: - sec 9.1.1.1: Is there a case where 'received' could be not 'true'. I mean how can you acknowledge something that you didn't receive? - I find the wording used saying "This document registers .." (in the whole document) not fully approrpiate because the main purpose of this doc is the spcification of the usage of these registrations. I would propose the following, e.g. OLD "This document registers "urn:service:test.sos.ecall" for eCall test calls." NEW "This document specifies "urn:service:test.sos.ecall" for eCall test calls and registers it in section X."