%% You should probably cite rfc6197 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-05,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-05},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary/05/},
    author =    {Karl Wolf},
    title =     {{Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Service List Boundary Extension}},
    pagetotal = 15,
    year =      2010,
    month =     dec,
    day =       16,
    abstract =  {Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) maps service identifiers and location information to service contact URIs. If a LoST client wants to discover available services for a particular location, it will perform a \textless{}listServicesByLocation\textgreater{} query to the LoST server. However, the LoST server, in its response, does not provide context information; that is, it does not provide any additional information about the geographical region within which the returned list of services is considered valid. Therefore, this document defines a Service List Boundary that returns a local context along with the list of services returned, in order to assist the client in not missing a change in available services when moving. This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.},
}