Skip to main content

FTP Transport for Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange over the Internet
draft-ietf-ediint-as3-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-03-13
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-03-06
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-03-06
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-03-06
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-03-03
04 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-03-02
2006-03-02
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-03-02
04 Amy Vezza
[Note]: 'There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be …
[Note]: 'There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be implementations and there thus appears to be value in publishing the document as an Informational RFC.  Significant comments that can not be addressed with an RFC Editor note might not be resolvable.' added by Amy Vezza
2006-03-02
04 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2006-03-02
04 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2006-03-01
04 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2006-03-01
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2006-03-01
04 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2006-03-01
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I expect an RFC Editor Note to resolve this issue.
  This document references RFCs 2630, 2632, and 2633, which are the
  …
[Ballot discuss]
I expect an RFC Editor Note to resolve this issue.
  This document references RFCs 2630, 2632, and 2633, which are the
  S/MIME v3 Specifications.  Please reference their updates, which
  are RFCs 3852, 3850, and 3851, respectively.  These updates are the
  S/MIME v3.1 Specifications.  Similarly, "Version 3" needs to be
  changed to "Version 3.1" in many places.
2006-03-01
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2006-02-28
04 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments:
As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2006-02-28
04 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2006-02-17
04 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-17
04 Scott Hollenbeck Ballot has been issued by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-17
04 Scott Hollenbeck Created "Approve" ballot
2006-02-17
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-02-17
04 (System) Last call text was added
2006-02-17
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-02-14
04 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-14
04 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to AD Evaluation from AD is watching by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-14
04 Scott Hollenbeck State Change Notice email list have been change to rvd2@drummondgroup.com,tharding@cyclonecommerce.com,rscott@cyclonecommerce.com from rvd2@drummondgroup.com
2006-02-08
04 Scott Hollenbeck Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-03-02 by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-08
04 Scott Hollenbeck
[Note]: 'There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be …
[Note]: 'There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be implementations and there thus appears to be value in publishing the document as an Informational RFC.  Significant comments that can not be addressed with an RFC Editor note might not be resolvable.' added by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-08
04 Scott Hollenbeck
[Note]: 'There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be …
[Note]: 'There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be implementations and there thus appears to be value in publishing the document as an Informational RFC.  Significant comments that can not be addressed with an RFC Editor note might not be resolvable.' added by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-08
04 Scott Hollenbeck Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state AD is watching
2006-01-24
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ediint-as3-04.txt
2005-04-07
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ediint-as3-03.txt
2004-03-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ediint-as3-02.txt
2003-07-31
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ediint-as3-01.txt
2003-06-30
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ediint-as3-00.txt