Skip to main content

Definition of Managed Objects for Battery Monitoring
draft-ietf-eman-battery-mib-20

Yes

(Joel Jaeggli)

No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -12)

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2014-12-16 for -16)
Thanks for addressing my Comments and explaining the error of my Discuss.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2014-12-01 for -13)
Thanks for addressing my comments. I still think the use of normative language in this bit of Section 5 text is a little strange, but I can also understand an argument for having it there:

Implementers SHOULD use appropriate privacy protections.  Battery
   monitoring of devices used by individuals SHOULD only occur with
   proper authorization.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2014-12-01 for -13)
Thanks for addressing my points.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-12-15 for -15)
I support Pete's discuss.

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2014-12-03 for -15)
Thanks for making the updates to the security considerations that were made across 3 documents and reflected our work on the updated SNMP security boilerplate for IoT security and privacy.

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2015-03-24 for -18)
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS. I sent my suggested update to the batteryChargingAdminState text to the authors.

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-07-10 for -12)
- Please see. [1]

   [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib/ballot/#stephen-farrell

- I support Pete's discuss. And echo his concern that similar
comments raised before on the reqs and framework don't seem to
have resulted in the wg considering these issues. 

- I did not have time to fully read this sorry but I've also
in the past asked if there are no issues with solar powered
devices. I again see no mention of solar power nor of charge
controllers (is that the same as a batter controller?) so I
again agree with Pete that the coverage here doesn't seem
correct - Pete's more concerned with BIG devices whereas
I'm more concerned with those that might be deployed in 
odd and out of the way places:-)