%% You should probably cite rfc9190 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11,
    number =    {draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13/11/},
    author =    {John Preuß Mattsson and Mohit Sethi},
    title =     {{Using EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3}},
    pagetotal = 30,
    year =      2020,
    month =     oct,
    day =       14,
    abstract =  {This document specifies the use of EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 while remaining backwards compatible with existing implementations of EAP- TLS. TLS 1.3 provides significantly improved security, privacy, and reduced latency when compared to earlier versions of TLS. EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 further improves security and privacy by mandating use of privacy and revocation checking. This document also provides guidance on authorization and resumption for EAP-TLS in general (regardless of the underlying TLS version used). This document updates RFC 5216.},
}