ENUM Requirement for EDNS0 Support
draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(enum WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jim Reid , Lawrence W. Conroy | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2006-09-06) | ||
| Replaces | draft-conroy-enum-edns0 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Best Current Practice | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Gonzalo Camarillo | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Support for EDNS0 (Extension Mechanisms for DNS) is mandated in this document for DNS entities querying for or serving NAPTR records. In general those entities will be supporting ENUM resolution. This requirement is needed because DNS responses to ENUM-related queries generally return large RRSets. Without EDNS0 support these lookups would result in truncated responses and repeated queries over TCP transport. That has a severe impact on DNS server load and on the latency of those queries. This document adds an operational requirement to use of the protocol standardised in RFC 3761.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)