ENUM Validation Token Format Definition
draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-04

Yes

(Jon Peterson)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Jon Peterson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
                    

                        

                            Chris Newman Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            (was Discuss, No Record, Discuss)
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2007-07-05)
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
The idea of the infinite validity seems very scary. I would prefer to see the expirationDate not be optionally. My worry is that, it is very likely that expirationDate will not be implemented at all.

I think it would be better of the XML for civil address information lined up with the XML for civic location in geopriv. 

The signature seem to be computed across all the data meaning that the tokendata information can not be removed. I can't decide if this is a bug or a feature.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2007-07-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
From the PROTO write-up: 

4. Do you have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)?
*Not really. Maybe some XML experts could have a look on the final version of this draft.

It would be useful indeed to confirm that some XML expert review happened and record it in the tracker.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            David Ward Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Jari Arkko Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Lars Eggert Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2007-07-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Section 4., paragraph 0:
> 4.  Field Descriptions

  Definitions and descriptions of the elements should use RFC2119
  terminology.

Section 11.2., paragraph 1:
>    [12]  Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)",
>          RFC 3730, March 2004.

  Obsoleted by RFC 4930.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            (was Discuss)
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2007-07-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Section 3.

   Validation Entities MUST be able to sign tokens according to XML-
   DSIG, MUST support at least SHA-256 as the digest algorithm and MUST
   be able to embed X.509 [10] certificates. 

I would propose to remove "at least". If one likes to point out that you may also support other algorithms, then add "and MAY support other algorithms". I also think there should be a referene for "SHA-256".

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Mark Townsley Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Ron Bonica Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Ross Callon Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Tim Polk Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            (was Discuss)
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    ()
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown