Ballot for draft-ietf-extra-sieve-action-registry
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Many thanks to Yoshiro Yoneya for his ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/IZC-lNTGOe7GJMJE2S19n4_Wi4k/.
Thank you to Donald E. Eastlake for the SECDIR review.
Other than supporting Eric's discuss, and saying thank you for writing this, I have nothing to add...
Thanks for addressing my previous DISCUSS [1] Regards -éric [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/hb3GqzuSFX2RoPbIXFFNPeA7GIA/
Hi, This document looks helpful, so thank you for this. No technical comments on the content. It does look like quite a few lines in the table are longer than I understood to be allowed in an text formatted RFC, but presumably the RFC editor will sort that out if needed. Regards, Rob