Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME
draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-04

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (fecframe WG)
Last updated 2012-10-25 (latest revision 2012-10-03)
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text pdf html
Stream WG state WG Document
Consensus Unknown
Document shepherd None
IESG IESG state Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed
Telechat date
Responsible AD Martin Stiemerling
IESG note Greg Shepherd (gjshep@gmail.com) is the document shepherd
Send notices to fecframe-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs@tools.ietf.org
FecFrame                                                         V. Roca
Internet-Draft                                                     INRIA
Intended status: Standards Track                               M. Cunche
Expires: April 6, 2013                                   INSA-Lyon/INRIA
                                                                J. Lacan
                                                          A. Bouabdallah
                                                 ISAE, Univ. of Toulouse
                                                            K. Matsuzono
                                                         Keio University
                                                         October 3, 2012

 Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME
                    draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-04

Abstract

   This document describes a fully-specified simple FEC scheme for Reed-
   Solomon codes over GF(2^^m), with 2 <= m <= 16, that can be used to
   protect arbitrary media streams along the lines defined by the
   FECFRAME framework.  Reed-Solomon codes belong to the class of
   Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) codes which means they offer optimal
   protection against packet erasures.  They are also systematic codes,
   which means that the source symbols are part of the encoding symbols.
   The price to pay is a limit on the maximum source block size, on the
   maximum number of encoding symbols, and a computational complexity
   higher than that of LDPC codes for instance.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 6, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the

Roca, et al.              Expires April 6, 2013                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft       Simple Reed-Solomon FEC Scheme         October 2012

   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   3.  Definitions Notations and Abbreviations  . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.1.  Definitions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.2.  Notations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.3.  Abbreviations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   4.  Common Procedures Related to the ADU Block and Source
       Block Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.1.  Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.2.  ADU Block Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.3.  Source Block Creation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   5.  Simple Reed-Solomon FEC Scheme over GF(2^^m) for Arbitrary
       ADU Flows  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     5.1.  Formats and Codes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
       5.1.1.  FEC Framework Configuration Information  . . . . . . . 11
       5.1.2.  Explicit Source FEC Payload ID . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
       5.1.3.  Repair FEC Payload ID  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
     5.2.  Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     5.3.  FEC Code Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
   6.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
     6.1.  Attacks Against the Data Flow  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
       6.1.1.  Access to Confidential Content . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
       6.1.2.  Content Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
     6.2.  Attacks Against the FEC Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Show full document text