Ballot for draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
"The Ethernet type is used to identify the frame as inter-FE LFB type. Ethertype TBA1 is to be used (XXX: Note to RFC editor, likely we wont get that value - update when available)." What is the status of the Ethertype registration with IEEE? Obviously this document shouldn't be published without it.
Liushucheng performed the opsdir review
I support Stephen's discuss points.
Thanks for addressing all transport comments!
Thanks for the speedy and thorough processing of my discuss points.
* I am not sure what the point of Section 9 is. There is not much IETF/IESG/IANA can do about this, can we? I think the authors/WG should take this up with the IEEE to get the required ethertype assigned before publication. * It would have been nice to include a basic IPv6 router example in addition to (or even instead of) the basic IPv4 router example. * I simply cannot visualize how the TLV encoded metadata format looks like inside the packet and how it saves 4 bytes per metadatum transferred. Specifically how does this differ from the encoding specified in section 6.2 of RFC5810 . Can you please clarify?