Interoperability Report for Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES)
draft-ietf-forces-interop-06
| The information below is for an old version of the document |
| Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (forces WG)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2013-04-11
(latest revision 2013-02-05)
|
|
Stream |
|
IETF
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
Informational
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
| Stream |
WG state
|
|
WG Document
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
None
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
Adrian Farrel
|
|
IESG note |
|
Joel Halpern (jmh@joelhalpern.com) is the Document Shepherd.
|
|
Send notices to |
|
forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-forces-interop@tools.ietf.org, jmh@joelhalpern.com
|
Internet Engineering Task Force W. Wang
Internet-Draft Zhejiang Gongshang University
Intended status: Informational K. Ogawa
Expires: August 10, 2013 NTT Corporation
E. Haleplidis
University of Patras
M. Gao
Hangzhou BAUD Networks
J. Hadi Salim
Mojatatu Networks
February 6, 2013
Interoperability Report for Forwarding and Control Element Separation
(ForCES)
draft-ietf-forces-interop-06
Abstract
This document captures results of the second Forwarding and Control
Element Separation (ForCES) interoperability test which took place on
February 24-25, 2011 in the Internet Technology Lab (ITL) of Zhejiang
Gongshang University, China. The document is an update to RFC 6053,
which captured the results of the first ForCES interoperability test.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 10, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Wang, et al. Expires August 10, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ForCES Interop Report February 2013
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. ForCES Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. ForCES FE Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Transport Mapping Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology and Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1. Date, Location, and Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2. Testbed Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2.1. Participants Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2.2. Testbed Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1. Scenario 1 - LFB Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.2. Scenario 2 - TML with IPSec . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.3. Scenario 3 - CE High Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.4. Scenario 4 - Packet forwarding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.1. LFB Operation Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2. TML with IPSec Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.3. CE High Availability Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.4. Packet Forwarding Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6. Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6.1. On Data Encapsulation Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Show full document text