Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Logical Functional Block (LFB) Subsidiary Management
draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management-02
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
No Objection
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-09-30)
Unknown
The shepherd write up does not mention if the XML has been mechanically validated. Hopefully it has.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-14)
Unknown
I agree with Ben's concern about validating the XML.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-09-30)
Unknown
You might want to consider removing the level of indirection in the Security Considerations as pointed out in the SecDir review. This is not critical, so I'll leave it up to the editors and AD. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05974.html
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown