Location Types Registry
draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-06
Yes
(Allison Mankin)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Ted Hardie)
No Objection
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-03-02)
Unknown
Based on Gen-ART review by John Loughney, but backing up David's Discuss.
The types are quite soft in nature and not algorithmically precise.
The scope for interpretation is wide. This will make both the expert
reviewer's task very vague, and operational choices very unclear.
"I found many of the location types confusing, for
example:
water:
The person is on water, such as an ocean, lake, river, canal or
other waterway.
watercraft:
The person is traveling in a boat or ship.
What about a swimmer or SCUBA diver? What if the boat is not moving, is
it still traveling? My gut feeling is that the place needs to be
separate from the action. Addtionally, prepositions should be separate
from the place (i.e. - on, in, above, under, etc.).
In summary - the location places should be just locations, there should
be no linkage to the activity of the target with respect to the
location."
David Kessens Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-02-28)
Unknown
To my great surprise, I'm a no-objection on this document rather than a discuss or abstain. The authors have done a good job of explaining how the registry might be used in enough detail that protocol designers can determine if this registry is appropriate. Also, the IANA considerations are much improved. Thanks for the great work with last call comments.
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown