Default External BGP (EBGP) Route Propagation Behavior without Policies
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas) Yes

(Ben Campbell) Yes

Alissa Cooper Yes

Warren Kumari Yes

Alexey Melnikov (was No Objection) Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

Adam Roach Yes

Comment (2017-06-05)
No email
send info
Thank you for Appendix A; I think it is very helpful.

Dale Worley's name appears twice in the Acknowledgements section.

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2017-06-08)
No email
send info
The Appendix A is typically what the OPS directorate would look for.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2017-06-06)
No email
send info
I echo Adam's appreciation for Appendix A.

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

(Eric Rescorla) No Objection

Comment (2017-06-06)
No email
send info
I am having a little trouble reading Appendix A.

If I understand correctly, the idea is:

- In version N, you have a behavior X
- In version N+1, you introduce a setting S with default value S=X
- In version N+2 you change the default to S=!X

However, the text says that "installations upgraded from release N+1 will adhere to the previous insecure behavior"

Do you need to say that in N+1, you save the value S=X so that in N+1, it continues to apply?