Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration
draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-06

The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC
Document Type RFC Internet-Draft (grow WG)
Authors Danny McPherson  , Shane Amante  , Eric Osterweil  , Larry Blunk  , Dave Mitchell 
Last updated 2015-12-10 (latest revision 2015-07-20)
Stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Chris Morrow
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2014-10-29)
IESG IESG state RFC 7682 (Informational)
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Responsible AD Joel Jaeggli
Send notices to (None)
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - No Actions Needed
IANA action state No IANA Actions
GROW Working Group                                          D. McPherson
Internet-Draft                                            Verisign, Inc.
Intended status: Informational                                 S. Amante
Expires: January 21, 2016                                    Apple, Inc.
                                                            E. Osterweil
                                                          Verisign, Inc.
                                                                L. Blunk
                                                     Merit Network, Inc.
                                                             D. Mitchell
                                                    Singularity Networks
                                                           July 20, 2015

           IRR & Routing Policy Configuration Considerations
         <draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-06>

Abstract

   The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
   the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
   routing policy specification and application in the global routing
   system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
   discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
   practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
   applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
   filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 21, 2016.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

McPherson, et al.       Expires January 21, 2016                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft     IRR & Routing Policy Considerations         July 2015

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

   2.  Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

   3.  Historical Artifacts Influencing IRR Efficacy  . . . . . . . .  4

   4.  Accuracy and Integrity of Data Contained within the IRR  . . .  5
     4.1.  Lack of Resource Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     4.2.  Incentives to Maintain Data within the IRR . . . . . . . .  6
     4.3.  Inability for Third Parties to Remove (Stale)
           Information from the IRRs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     4.4.  Lack of Authoritative IRR for Resources  . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.5.  Client-Side Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     4.6.  Conclusions with respect to Data in the IRR  . . . . . . .  9

   5.  Operation of the IRR Infrastructure  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     5.1.  Replication of Resources Among IRRs  . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     5.2.  Updating Routing Policies from Updated IRR Resources . . . 11

   6.  Historical BGP Protocol Limitations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

   7.  Historical Limitations of Routers  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
     7.1.  Incremental Updates to Policy on Routers . . . . . . . . . 14
     7.2.  Storage Requirements for Policy on Routers . . . . . . . . 14
     7.3.  Updating Configuration on Routers  . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

   8.  Summary  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

   9.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

   10. IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

   11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

   12. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

McPherson, et al.       Expires January 21, 2016                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft     IRR & Routing Policy Considerations         July 2015

   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Show full document text