Use of BGP Large Communities
draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07
Yes
Warren Kumari
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
No Objection
(Adam Roach)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Ben Campbell)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Warren Kumari
Yes
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-05-09)
Unknown
So this is basically for attaching arbitrary tags to BGP routes? Privacy Considerations probably need to be added to this document.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-05-11)
Unknown
Introduction BGP Large Communities [RFC8092] provide a mechanism to signal opaque information between Autonomous Systems (ASs). Not only "between": BGP communities might also be used inside an AS, as you described in the "informational communities" As mentioned by Jouni in his OPS-DIR review: One minor nit I have relates to management & administration to the large communities functions and description of their semantics. Are those maintained somewhere? If there are existing repositories, documentation, etc it would be nice to point out those. The document now hints to NANOG and NLNOG..
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-05-10)
Unknown
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review (and GenArt). https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/T4xX2o_TrMIRVQ1Z2u25wGvxR0U
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-05-09)
Unknown
Overall the document was well written and easy to read. I did have one question though. It is not clear how the values for the Local data part 1 are matched up to the functions and communicated between the peer ASes? Is this going to stay purely a local matter between ASes or is there going to be a movement towards some sets of known functions (e.g. the BGP blackhole community RFC7999)?
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown