%% You should probably cite rfc6266 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-httpbis-content-disp-09, number = {draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-09}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp/09/}, author = {Julian Reschke}, title = {{Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)}}, pagetotal = 14, year = 2011, month = mar, day = 28, abstract = {RFC 2616 defines the Content-Disposition response header field, but points out that it is not part of the HTTP/1.1 Standard. This specification takes over the definition and registration of Content-Disposition, as used in HTTP, and clarifies internationalization aspects. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }