Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations
draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-15
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2014-05-29
|
15 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2014-05-20
|
15 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2014-04-16
|
15 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from REF |
2014-04-15
|
15 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to REF from EDIT |
2014-02-18
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2014-02-17
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2014-02-17
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2014-02-17
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2014-02-17
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2014-02-17
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2014-02-14
|
15 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2014-02-12
|
15 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2014-02-12
|
15 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2014-02-12
|
15 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2014-02-12
|
15 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2014-02-12
|
15 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2014-02-12
|
15 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-02-12
|
15 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2014-02-12
|
15 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2014-02-06
|
15 | Julian Reschke | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed |
2014-02-06
|
15 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-15.txt |
2013-12-30
|
14 | Gunter Van de Velde | Closed request for Telechat review by OPSDIR with state 'No Response' |
2013-12-19
|
14 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2013-12-19
|
14 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2013-12-19
|
14 | Amanda Baber | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Yes from No Objection |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Sean Turner | [Ballot comment] I might have said the following in addition to no security considerations: Security considerations for each method are described in the referenced RFC. |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2013-12-18
|
14 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2013-12-17
|
14 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2013-12-17
|
14 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2013-12-17
|
14 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2013-12-12
|
14 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-12-12
|
14 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-12-04
|
14 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2013-11-17
|
14 | Julian Reschke | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA - Not OK |
2013-11-17
|
14 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14.txt |
2013-11-11
|
13 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Michael Sneed |
2013-11-11
|
13 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Michael Sneed |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov. |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Ballot has been issued |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-12-19 |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Barry Leiba | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2013-11-05
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2013-11-04
|
13 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call (ends 2013-11-04) |
2013-10-30
|
13 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-30
|
13 | Pearl Liang | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon … IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon as possible. We received the following comments/questions from the IANA's reviewer: IANA has a question about one of the IANA actions requested in this document. IANA also notes that one of the actions in the IANA Considerations section is dependent upon the approval of another draft being considered by the IESG: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging. IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is one action which IANA must complete. First, a new registry, called the HTTP Method Registry, will be created via the approval of the document draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics. This new registry has eight initial registrations as a result of the potential approval of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics. The new registry is proposed to be located at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-methods The registration rule for this name space is defined by draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics as IETF Review as defined in RFC 5226. Each registration is made up of a method name, Safe?, Idempotent? and a reference. This document appears to add new registrations to the new registry created by draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics. IANA Question -> Appendix A of this draft is titled "Initial Registry Contents." Are the contents of Appendix A intended to be be added to the initial registrations provided by draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics or are they a replacement of those initial registrations? IANA believes that the intent is to add these new registrations because of the text in Section 1 of the draft. The current document requests that the following methods be added to the HTTP Method Registry, created via the approval of the document draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics: There are initial registrations in this new registry as follows: +-------------------+------+------------+---------------------------+ | Method Name | Safe | Idempotent | Reference | +-------------------+------+------------+---------------------------+ | ACL | no | yes | [RFC3744], Section 8.1 | | BASELINE-CONTROL | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 12.6 | | BIND | no | yes | [RFC5842], Section 4 | | CHECKIN | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 4.4 | | | | | and [RFC3253], Section | | | | | 9.4 | | CHECKOUT | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 4.3 | | | | | and [RFC3253], Section | | | | | 8.8 | | COPY | no | yes | [RFC4918], Section 9.8 | | LABEL | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 8.2 | | LINK | no | yes | [RFC2068], Section | | | | | 19.6.1.2 | | LOCK | no | no | [RFC4918], Section 9.10 | | MERGE | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 11.2 | | MKACTIVITY | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 13.5 | | MKCALENDAR | no | yes | [RFC4791], Section 5.3.1 | | MKCOL | no | yes | [RFC4918], Section 9.3 | | MKREDIRECTREF | no | yes | [RFC4437], Section 6 | | MKWORKSPACE | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 6.3 | | MOVE | no | yes | [RFC4918], Section 9.9 | | ORDERPATCH | no | yes | [RFC3648], Section 7 | | PATCH | no | no | [RFC5789], Section 2 | | PROPFIND | yes | yes | [RFC4918], Section 9.1 | | PROPPATCH | no | yes | [RFC4918], Section 9.2 | | REBIND | no | yes | [RFC5842], Section 6 | | REPORT | yes | yes | [RFC3253], Section 3.6 | | SEARCH | yes | yes | [RFC5323], Section 2 | | UNBIND | no | yes | [RFC5842], Section 5 | | UNCHECKOUT | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 4.5 | | UNLINK | no | yes | [RFC2068], Section | | | | | 19.6.1.3 | | UNLOCK | no | yes | [RFC4918], Section 9.11 | | UPDATE | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 7.1 | | UPDATEREDIRECTREF | no | yes | [RFC4437], Section 7 | | VERSION-CONTROL | no | yes | [RFC3253], Section 3.5 | +-------------------+------+------------+---------------------------+ IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. |
2013-10-24
|
13 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-10-24
|
13 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty |
2013-10-24
|
13 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Alexey Melnikov |
2013-10-24
|
13 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Alexey Melnikov |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations) to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis WG (httpbis) to consider the following document: - 'Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-11-04. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established. Note that this document is part of a set, which should be reviewed together: * draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging * draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics * draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional * draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range * draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache * draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth * draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations * draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/ Once IESG evaluation begins, IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Amy Vezza | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Last call was requested |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Barry Leiba | State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was changed |
2013-10-21
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was generated |
2013-10-19
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-10-19
|
13 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was generated |
2013-10-18
|
13 | Barry Leiba | State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Cindy Morgan | 1. Summary Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13 Document Shepherd: Mark Nottingham Responsible Area Director: Barry Leiba Publication Type: Proposed Standard This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) … 1. Summary Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13 Document Shepherd: Mark Nottingham Responsible Area Director: Barry Leiba Publication Type: Proposed Standard This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established. Note that this document is part of a set, which should be reviewed together: * draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging * draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics * draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional * draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range * draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache * draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth * draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations * draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations 2. Review and Consensus As chartered, this work was very constrained; the WG sought only to clarify RFC2616, making significant technical changes only where there were considerably interoperability or security issues. While the bulk of the work was done by a core team of editors, it has been reviewed by a substantial number of implementers, and design issues enjoyed input from many of them. It has been through Working Group Last Call, with multiple reviewers. We have also discussed this work with external groups (e.g., the W3C TAG). 3. Intellectual Property There are no IPR disclosures against this document. The author has confirmed that he has no direct, personal knowledge of IPR related to this document that has not been disclosed. 4. Other Points Downward references: None. New registries created: None. Updated registries: None. |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Mark Nottingham | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Mark Nottingham | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Mark Nottingham | Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Mark Nottingham | IESG state set to Publication Requested |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Mark Nottingham | Changed document writeup |
2013-10-07
|
13 | Mark Nottingham | Document shepherd changed to Mark Nottingham |
2013-09-25
|
13 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13.txt |
2013-08-06
|
12 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-12.txt |
2013-02-23
|
11 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-11.txt |
2012-10-13
|
10 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-10.txt |
2012-07-16
|
09 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-09.txt |
2012-07-05
|
08 | Barry Leiba | Responsible AD changed to Barry Leiba from Peter Saint-Andre |
2012-07-02
|
08 | Julian Reschke | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-08.txt |
2012-01-03
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-07.txt |
2011-10-17
|
07 | Peter Saint-Andre | Draft added in state AD is watching |
2011-07-08
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-06.txt |
2011-01-06
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-05.txt |
2010-07-12
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-04.txt |
2010-03-08
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-03.txt |
2009-11-29
|
07 | (System) | Document has expired |
2009-05-28
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-02.txt |
2008-12-01
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-01.txt |
2008-09-09
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-00.txt |