Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 24 and is now closed.

Barry Leiba Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2013-12-19 for -25)
No email
send info
Meral Shirazipour raised some editorial comments in the Gen-ART review. I thought that the examples comment was a valid one, for instance. But I have not seen a response. Did the authors consider the comments?

(Of course, not all comments may result in changes. For instance, the issues of splitting or merging the documents are in my opinion something that is difficult to deal with at this stage, and I understand the WG if they do not want to make changes. Assuming all relevant text is still somewhere and reachable through references, of course.)

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2013-12-19 for -25)
No email
send info
*) I'll not repeats the OWS discuss point from p1.  If it gets changed there I assume it will get changed here.  If not then this can be ignored.

0) Abstract: Maybe would add stateless in front of protocol in the description.